Middle of the month, time for another letter to Pat Lykos; if you want to know what you can do to help, please print this out, put your name on the bottom and send it off!
District Attorney Patricia Lykos
1201 Franklin St
Houston, TX
77002
Ma’am,
I’m writing today about the case of Carlos Coy, #908426.
I recently read an article by the Washington Post that stated the FBI was reviewing thousands of criminal conviction that may have resulted in wrongful convictions based on flawed forensic evidence.
In this era of shows like ‘CSI’, the public tends to assume that in a case where there is any physical evidence, an absolute determination of guilt or innocence is simply a matter of putting DNA into a machine and then reading the print-out.
The federal government has vast and seemingly un-ending resources to use when it comes to determining guilt, but in these cases they chose to rely on questionable methods. Now they have to go back and see how many citizens they have wrongfully deprived of liberty.
How much more likely is it for the wrong conclusion to be reached in a case in which there is no physical evidence at all? If the government will knowingly misrepresent solid physical evidence, how much easier would it be to create an appearance of guilt in the minds of a jury when none exists in reality?
As we know from previous Texas exonerations, it happens. I believe that’s why Carlos Coy is imprisoned today and I urge you once more to look into his case; he has wide-ranging support from people like myself. We want very much to understand how a man could be convicted of such a terrible crime with nothing more than the inconsistent testimony of a young child who may have been manipulated by agents of the state, medical professionals, or her own parents.
Please, give us justice.
Me, my address, blah blah blah.
Updated Thursdays
Sunday, July 15, 2012
Saturday, July 14, 2012
Weekend Reading 39
An update on the progress of the collaborative mix tape ‘Can’t Stop The Hustle’; it should be done next month, projected release on the 5th. I got an update from James Dehuelves, one of the originators, and he answered a few questions for me…
How many artists came together for this project?
Ten to fifteen; Mistha Fire, Jose Martinez, LJ Blaze Records and Calico Records, Roy Sandoval, Lumbrera Wedell G-Fo Mendez and DJ Faze and also Lady Smiles, ak47, Big Papa El Asesino, also Dropp Topp Records. There’s a lot of labels from up north and down south. This mix tape is going world-wide.
Who’s going to love this mixtape?
I hope everyone does!
Do you have any more upcoming projects? Tell us a little about them.
Yes I do; I’m working on the Lansing take-over and still will be pushing Can’t Stop the Hustle, the movement until they free the Mexican and even after. I’m working with some new artists, also networking down south a lot and I hope this project will have a vol. 2.
I really admire all the people that came together to work on this, and I’m looking forward to seeing it finished; this is the kind of awareness-raising that I believe is going to be instrumental in reaching people who may otherwise not have heard the truth.
Note: This is not an SPM album, but a project whose goal is to let people know what's going on.
Wednesday, July 11, 2012
Seeking Solutions
Grits for Breakfast has a link to an amazing series up at the Texas Tribune; made by Brandi Grissom, Ryan Murphy and Justin Dehn, it outlines a few recent and high-profile exonerations, talks about how it happened and what is being done and what could be done to prevent wrongful convictions in the future.
There are four articles and a video, which you can see here.
There’s the story of Michael Morton, and his son Eric; there’s an interview with Anthony Graves, Kerry Max Cook, and Dallas D.A. Craig Watkins who has been actively seeking out cases that sent innocent men to prison.
This is where Texas is, right now. The Kill-Someone-And-We-Will-Kill-You-Back state is just now coming to grips with the fact that its prisons may be housing innocent men. How can this culture of conviction at all costs be squared with Texan’s fiercely independent, liberty-loving history?
Please, take a moment to read these articles, watch the video, and then take a look at this page.
Look at the faces displayed there; it does not matter what color your skin is; what your age is, your sex, your criminal history or financial backround. If the state of Texas wants you in chains, they will get you.
They win because they have unlimited resources, they have the police on their side. The State pays the judges, the prosecutors, the experts. If they decide you’re going down, then that’s what will happen because we have refused to call them out on it.
Don’t let this continue. Stand up. Demand that the state of Texas explain the bewildering conviction of Carlos Coy, one acheived without evidence, without convincing proof, without reason.
There are four articles and a video, which you can see here.
There’s the story of Michael Morton, and his son Eric; there’s an interview with Anthony Graves, Kerry Max Cook, and Dallas D.A. Craig Watkins who has been actively seeking out cases that sent innocent men to prison.
This is where Texas is, right now. The Kill-Someone-And-We-Will-Kill-You-Back state is just now coming to grips with the fact that its prisons may be housing innocent men. How can this culture of conviction at all costs be squared with Texan’s fiercely independent, liberty-loving history?
Please, take a moment to read these articles, watch the video, and then take a look at this page.
Look at the faces displayed there; it does not matter what color your skin is; what your age is, your sex, your criminal history or financial backround. If the state of Texas wants you in chains, they will get you.
They win because they have unlimited resources, they have the police on their side. The State pays the judges, the prosecutors, the experts. If they decide you’re going down, then that’s what will happen because we have refused to call them out on it.
Don’t let this continue. Stand up. Demand that the state of Texas explain the bewildering conviction of Carlos Coy, one acheived without evidence, without convincing proof, without reason.
Sunday, July 8, 2012
Prejudice
It seems trite but necessary to observe that our criminal system is accusatorial, not inquisitional, where the Rules of Evidence, not prosecutorial fury, are to prevail, and the prosecutor is not permitted to assume the role of Torquemada.
Though the appellant failed to properly preserve many errors resulting from the prosecutor's misconduct, the facts of the present case, in which impermissible prejudice permeates the entire record, indicate that even frequent instructions to disregard would not have sufficed to remove the prejudice.
This is from the case of Donald D. Rogers, written by the Texas Court of Appeals when they overturned his trial. Sometime in the ‘80s he was found guilty of ‘Indecency with a Child’, sentenced to serve six years and fined $6,000.
I found it through the blog of John T. Floyd, which I highly recommend if you’re interested in reading successfully appealed cases; obviously we’re talking about the appeal here, not the guilt or innocence of the defendant; I don’t know what ultimately happened to this guy, and I’m not particularly interested.
What interests me is the court’s finding that “the prosecutor's conduct during the trial, particularly her sidebar remarks, assumption of inflammatory facts not in evidence, prejudicial remarks stating her personal opinion, and improper bolstering, was manifestly improper and indicated a willful and calculated effort to deny the appellant a fair trial, thereby resulting in fundamental error.”
Apparently it is possible for a prosecutor to act so outrageously that her behavior alone is enough to overturn a conviction. However, this is not what I’m comparing to Carlos Coy’s case; we’ve only seen a small part of the 6,000 page transcript, so we don’t know how the prosecutors behaved throughout the whole trial.
What I find interesting here is that the TCA admitted that enough little, prejudicial shit happened that, while not technically illegal, it would be impossible to deny that the jury could ignore it. Coy said about his appeal “nothing was significant enough, out of the eight, or so, mistakes that my appeals lawyer brought up, to win my appeal. It’s like I was killed by thousands of ant bites.”
In at least one trial in Texas that, in and of itself, was enough to get a man back into court.
Although I imagine all the judges sitting on that court have long since retired or moved on, the precedent should still stand. A ‘willful and calculated effort’ to deny someone a fair trial should be enough to get that trial re-done.
So now the question becomes, is there evidence that the prosecutors denied Coy a fair shake? Well, we saw how Judge Ellis allowed the prosecutors to craft a story they liked, then change it suddenly when the little girl wouldn’t keep up her end of it.
He allowed the prosecutors to use the unverifiable testimony of Heidi Ruiz that the first, unrecorded interview she had with Jane Doe was EXACTLY the same as the second one. In Coy’s words: “Ruiz typed the statement herself. She watched the child’s interview, then got with her mother to type a statement that was consistent with what the child said.”
Mary Doe was allowed to testify that her father had died of a heart attack because he was told that Carlos Coy assaulted her daughter.
The prosecutors were allowed to hide the truth behind the symptoms that Jane Doe was experiencing: “The problem in my criminal trial was that the judge didn’t allow Chip to talk about anything having to do with the child’s home environment. He said it wasn’t relevant. So the jury heard nothing revealing about this family. They probably believed they were church-going Christians like Mary Doe had told them.
Without Chip being able to show the home conditions causing Jane Doe’s disorder, his point was missing important pieces.”
It’s a lot, but is it enough? The only way we’ll ever know is to keep looking into this; keep pushing for the truth, keep asking the D.A. to look into it, keep spreading the word about what went on.
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14696537595186930184&q=725+S.W.2d+350++&hl=en&as_sdt=2,44
Though the appellant failed to properly preserve many errors resulting from the prosecutor's misconduct, the facts of the present case, in which impermissible prejudice permeates the entire record, indicate that even frequent instructions to disregard would not have sufficed to remove the prejudice.
This is from the case of Donald D. Rogers, written by the Texas Court of Appeals when they overturned his trial. Sometime in the ‘80s he was found guilty of ‘Indecency with a Child’, sentenced to serve six years and fined $6,000.
I found it through the blog of John T. Floyd, which I highly recommend if you’re interested in reading successfully appealed cases; obviously we’re talking about the appeal here, not the guilt or innocence of the defendant; I don’t know what ultimately happened to this guy, and I’m not particularly interested.
What interests me is the court’s finding that “the prosecutor's conduct during the trial, particularly her sidebar remarks, assumption of inflammatory facts not in evidence, prejudicial remarks stating her personal opinion, and improper bolstering, was manifestly improper and indicated a willful and calculated effort to deny the appellant a fair trial, thereby resulting in fundamental error.”
Apparently it is possible for a prosecutor to act so outrageously that her behavior alone is enough to overturn a conviction. However, this is not what I’m comparing to Carlos Coy’s case; we’ve only seen a small part of the 6,000 page transcript, so we don’t know how the prosecutors behaved throughout the whole trial.
What I find interesting here is that the TCA admitted that enough little, prejudicial shit happened that, while not technically illegal, it would be impossible to deny that the jury could ignore it. Coy said about his appeal “nothing was significant enough, out of the eight, or so, mistakes that my appeals lawyer brought up, to win my appeal. It’s like I was killed by thousands of ant bites.”
In at least one trial in Texas that, in and of itself, was enough to get a man back into court.
Although I imagine all the judges sitting on that court have long since retired or moved on, the precedent should still stand. A ‘willful and calculated effort’ to deny someone a fair trial should be enough to get that trial re-done.
So now the question becomes, is there evidence that the prosecutors denied Coy a fair shake? Well, we saw how Judge Ellis allowed the prosecutors to craft a story they liked, then change it suddenly when the little girl wouldn’t keep up her end of it.
He allowed the prosecutors to use the unverifiable testimony of Heidi Ruiz that the first, unrecorded interview she had with Jane Doe was EXACTLY the same as the second one. In Coy’s words: “Ruiz typed the statement herself. She watched the child’s interview, then got with her mother to type a statement that was consistent with what the child said.”
Mary Doe was allowed to testify that her father had died of a heart attack because he was told that Carlos Coy assaulted her daughter.
The prosecutors were allowed to hide the truth behind the symptoms that Jane Doe was experiencing: “The problem in my criminal trial was that the judge didn’t allow Chip to talk about anything having to do with the child’s home environment. He said it wasn’t relevant. So the jury heard nothing revealing about this family. They probably believed they were church-going Christians like Mary Doe had told them.
Without Chip being able to show the home conditions causing Jane Doe’s disorder, his point was missing important pieces.”
It’s a lot, but is it enough? The only way we’ll ever know is to keep looking into this; keep pushing for the truth, keep asking the D.A. to look into it, keep spreading the word about what went on.
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14696537595186930184&q=725+S.W.2d+350++&hl=en&as_sdt=2,44
Saturday, July 7, 2012
Weekend Reading 38
If you weren't at Urban Fest 2012 in San Antonio last weekend, you missed 2Live Crew, Bone Thugs'n Harmony, Jes Latino, and the Hooligan Boyz; you also missed the chance to look up at me and shout "Daaamn, that's a huge bitch!
But most importantly, you missed an energetic performance by Rasheed, including one of his newer tracks and three Dope House classics; every person there knew the songs, and it was very encouraging to see the crowd's reaction.
I was able to pass out some cards with the blog address and talk to a few people about the case. I really want to urge you to get out there and spread the word; people want to hear about this and you're helping them by pointing them to this blog, where they can find SPM's take on it.
Here's a few things I picked up at the show...
The kid I talked to who was selling these CDs was very enthusiastic about the blog; check out their music on Facebook & support local artists.
But most importantly, you missed an energetic performance by Rasheed, including one of his newer tracks and three Dope House classics; every person there knew the songs, and it was very encouraging to see the crowd's reaction.
I was able to pass out some cards with the blog address and talk to a few people about the case. I really want to urge you to get out there and spread the word; people want to hear about this and you're helping them by pointing them to this blog, where they can find SPM's take on it.
Here's a few things I picked up at the show...
The kid I talked to who was selling these CDs was very enthusiastic about the blog; check out their music on Facebook & support local artists.
Wednesday, July 4, 2012
Dear Family (Part 6)
El Fam,
I won’t make this letter very long,
because, as you’ll see, I’ve got another, rather long letter for you to read.
It’s something that I originally wrote for a young man whom I do not know by
name. But his sister wrote me, a girl out of Houston named Patricia. She told
me that her brother was not doing so well, and described a little of his
situation. His story was so similar to mine, when I was his age, that I was
compelled to reach out to him. After finishing his letter, I realized that my
words could possibly benefit others. I’d like to know what you think about the
letter, in which Incandesio will send me your comments, if you have any. She
always sends me your uplifting entries, and I’m truly blessed to have you as
friends, fans and family.
At the end of the letter I’ve got a
Cold Forty that I rewrote from something that I wrote in the past, but not on
this blog. So, I hope you’ll enjoy it, and I shall speak to you, again, very
soon.
Con Amor,
Los
---
What’s Up, Lil
Brother,
It’s da boy S.P. coming your way
with a few lines. Your sister wrote me and told me a little about you, and how
much she loved you, and if I could write you a few words of encouragement. But
she didn’t give me your name so you’ll have to be “Lil Brother” for today.
Her description of your life sounded
almost identical to mine. I kept failing the ninth grade, all the way till I
was seventeen. That’s when I said, “Fuck it, I’m gone.”
I constantly broke my mom’s heart
and all she ever did was give me everything she could.
I was always in some shit, getting
jumped, getting blowed, running from police. I never joined a gang, but many of
my friends were banging, so I was right in the middle of it.
Here’s the thing, though: I knew I
was fucking up, just like you know. Really, we all know right from wrong;
that’s not the problem. The problem is we just don’t give a fuck.
“Carlos, you’re destroying your
life.”
“So.”
“What are you going to do when
you’re an adult and all you have is garbage in your head?”
“I’m not worried about it.”
“You’re going to end up in prison;
that’s if you’re lucky. If not, you’ll be in a cemetery.”
“I don’t care.”
My mom didn’t realize it, but she
was spoiling me by giving me what I should’ve worked for with good grades and
good behavior. All she got was me disrespecting her. But every new day brought
a fresh batch of my mom’s forgiveness as I continued being a bad person. It’s
not her fault, she was just doing her best. But when you spoil a kid, a really
bad thing takes place; that kid becomes selfish than a mothafucker. He won’t
give a damn who he hurts, even if it’s his own mom, or grandmother, or
girlfriend. Mix spoiledness with a painful upbringing and you’ve got a
nightmare in the house. But for every throwed-off, selfish dude, there’s always
some damaged chick who will take his shit. It’ll be a fucked up relationship,
but it happens all the time. And then they have kids, and the kids get built
with the same shit, thus the infamous cycle powers on.
I used to blame my dad for my
problems because he was never around, but I don’t know what my dad’s life was
like. I wasn’t there when he was a baby absorbing his environment. Some people
have colder hearts, they’re more emotionally dull, but it’s not because they’re
evil. It’s just the ingredients they were made with.
Psychologists say that the first
five years of life make a person into who he’ll be for the rest of his life.
They say the first years of life is when a person’s brain absorbs the most
content. So, while that little baby is drooling all over the place, his mind is
collecting data at a record-setting pace. It’s not so much that he’s learning,
but more like being made. And, like I said, by the time he’s five, the sponge
is full. His definition of normal is established. Whatever that “normal” is,
will be the world he feels most comfortable in. So, if his definition of normal
involves a high level of pain, he’ll create a life for himself that produces
that level. Maybe gang life, or drug use, or just being pissed-off about
everything. Whatever it takes because our normal is a force that we feel
off-balance unless we’re living in it.
So, what can we do when pain, and
drama, and bullshit make us feel whole? I’ve been working on that one for
years. Even when I was making tons of money, driving expensive cars, living in
a castle, I was still putting myself in bullshit. I was still getting
shot at, still breaking my wife’s heart, still getting all fucked up. It didn’t
have to be that way, but money don’t change shit. We still need the life that
our normal craves. Even though I’m in prison on a fraud-ass charge, I guarantee
you that prison saved my life. I’m lucky to be alive because I kept chasing
trouble, and trouble would’ve surely buried me by now.
It sounds like you’re on a similar
path, bro, but just one letter won’t do much. After a few months, or a few
blunts, you won’t remember a damn thing I said. All I can tell you, little
brother, is that I love you, and it’s not your fault. It’s no one’s fault. It
doesn’t mean we don’t need penitentiaries, but we damn sure don’t need
judgmental dick suckers. I always hear some dumb bitch saying, “Well, once a
person gets a certain age, they can choose what they want in life. If they
choose to fuck up, it’s their own fault.”
Whoever thinks that way doesn’t
realize that, for some people, it’s harder to make good choices. And the harder
something is, the more people fail. For others it’s easier because their
definition of normal involves less pain, so they’ll make better decisions
because they feel more comfortable in better environments. I had all the nicest
things in the world, but I still hung out in the worst places because that was
the only time I felt at home.
It reminds me of that chick who
don’t feel right with the right guy. “He’s too boring, too mushy, corny, no
challenge.” She has no idea why she goes dry around this guy, but it’s a
natural reaction. Then she meets the exciting guy, the one who’s a challenge,
the one who makes her feel alive. Now her donut gets wetter than a dolphin, but
two months later she’s getting treated like dog shit. Still, she’ll stick with
this dude as he drags her through a thousand miles of misery. Why? Because,
somehow, this dude provides a life that is closer to her definition of normal
that what the nice guy can provide. She’s instinctively attracted to pain, and
instincts are harder to fight than a twenty-one year old Mike Tyson.
I’ve always said that the world’s
worst addiction is pain. That’s where it all starts. You’re not hurting your
mom because you hate her. You’re not disrespecting those who love you because
you want to hurt them. You’re doing it because it gives you the purest, most
uncut pain that life can offer. Right now it’s your mom, but later it’ll be
your wife.
But when I tell you it’s not your
fault, I can hear that same dumb bitch saying, “All you’re doing is letting
people off the hook. You’re telling them it’s okay to be pieces of shit
because, anyway, it’s not their fault.”
“No, dumb bitch, I’m explaining the
facts. It doesn’t mean that a person should stay the same. If you buy a new car
and it breaks down two miles up the road, it’s not your fault; but that doesn’t
mean you put an address on the motherfucker and live in it. You still gotta get
it fixed. But to fix a problem, or, in this case, to defeat demons, you have to
know who they are, how they operate, when they infiltrated.”
“Fine, but you didn’t have to call
me a dumb bitch.”
“Sorry.”
Love is the most powerful force in
existence – it’s the answer – but I can’t just inject you with love. I can’t make
you care for yourself. All I can say is no matter what you did in the past, you
deserve the best. The thing about that is only you can give yourself the best.
Only you can do that homework every night, only you can be kind and respectful,
only you can make the right decisions during those critical times in life.
You’ve got one chance to prepare for
adulthood and that’s right now. Adulthood is like a coming storm but, while
you’re young, you can build a strong house, with weather-proof windows, good
plumbing, good electrical, beautiful inside and out. So when the storm comes,
you just sit back and eat popcorn.
The “house” I’m talking about is
your life, bro. If you don’t build it right then it’ll be weak. You’ll either
live some bullshit life where you’re still hurting people, or be layed up in a
cage or a casket. This isn’t what I think, this is one plus one equals two.
I’m not trying to tell you what to
do because I don’t think no one can. But if, and that’s a big “if”, you can
find some love in yourself, to start fighting for yourself, you can give
yourself a rich life. I won’t lie to you, it’s not easy, and most people in our
position fail. Actually, that’s not true; most of them don’t even try because
they don’t have the love to give a fuck. If you can’t find the love, what can I
say? I damn sure won’t judge you. But if you wanna try, here’s a few
instructions.
First of all, you can’t hang out
with fuck-ups. If you want to put your life on the right path, you can’t walk
with people on the wrong path. It’s common sense but a lot of dumbasses have
tried to quit drinking, quit smoking, quit fucking up, but they kept the same
friends. It doesn’t work.
Second of all, (which I just
mentioned), you have to quit drinking and smoking. Patricia didn’t tell me if
you did or not, but I’m pretty sure you do. You’ve got to find a place that can
help you, because addiction to weed and alcohol is not easy to break. Lots of
dumbasses have said “Man, I can quit anytime I want, I just don’t want to.”
“Well, not wanting to is called
addiction, dumbass!” (By-the-way, I was the dumbass in the examples given.)
And last, you’ve got to figure out a
plan to educate yourself. Then, stick with it. I can pretty much bet that you
failed the ninth grade again, so now you’ll be seventeen in pre-algebra with a
bunch of rug rats. My older brother dropped out of school to start working, but
he came back a few years later. He was twenty-one when he graduated, and
there’s no shame in that. He might’ve been the only kid at lunch with potato
chips in his beard, but his classmates were too scared to laugh about it.
(laughing)
Or, you can take G.E.D. classes,
graduate that way, and go from there. With a G.E.D. you can go straight to Jr.
College, which is what I did, and get an Associate’s Degree, which is what I
didn’t do. Or, after two years of Jr. College, you can transfer to a four-year
college, and get a Bachelor’s, or even a Master’s Degree. You can also take a
trade in Jr. College like mechanics, or plumbing, or even be a cop.
“Booooooo!”
“Hey! Who said that?!!”
“Not me.”
There’s many good options, little
brother. If I were you, I’d talk to a school counselor and see what advice he
or she can give you. Just say, “Look, I’m sixteen, hung out with the wrong
people, still in the ninth grade, but I want to try to save me life. Can you
help me with a plan?” That’s what counselors are for, so make ‘em earn their
paycheck.
If you ask me, I say stick with high
school. But, if possible, start over at a new school, so that old friends won’t
be able to make things difficult for you.
Before I go let me say one last
thing: maybe you’ve made some dishonest money before. Maybe sold a little weed,
or some stolen rims, or maybe you’ve done worse. I’ve been there; I had four
felonies by the time I was fourteen, and that’s just what’s on paper. I want you
to know that I’m not trying to preach when I tell you this. All I’m doing is
relaying the truth. If you don’t listen, you won’t be the first or the last.
With that said, I want you to remember five words: Always make your money
honestly. Whenever the time comes for you to make a living, whether it’s now or
after you’ve gotten a degree in grooming hamsters, make sure your every penny
is made legally. The richest criminal in the world might have nice things, but
he’ll never have happiness. Because the main ingredient for happiness is peace,
and dishonest money robs you of that priceless treasure. A dope dealer living
like Donald Trump would be better off flipping burgers for Ronald McDonald.
Only the blind believe that an abundance of money makes you rich. That belief
is one of the cruelest jokes that life can play on us. True wealth is good
health, a peaceful home, and beautiful relationships. Only honest men can have
all three.
I’m no angel, bro. I make lots of
mistakes. But I love God and I love people. I don’t know a lot about the Bible,
but I know God said, “Listen, if you have ears!” If you don’t have ears, well,
I guess you got a damn good excuse. But how do you wear sunglasses if……..Let me
stop trippin. Good luck, bro.
Con Amor,
Los
---
Now, let us
twist the top off of
Another Cold 40
“This Is Not
Chess”
I been locked up
so damn long I feel like Socrates
think the last
movie that I saw was fuckin Rocky 3
wait, was it
Rocky 2? neva mind I can't recall
Hey, do they
still sell Screw cassettes at the mall?
what about the
carnival, where I shot the basketball
won that Fara
Fawcett shirt, and that little rabbit claw
every line I rap
is raw so I hope you have a straw
really I'm da
crack 'n' ya'll softa than a padded bra
spongy like a
deer nose or squooshy like some earlobes
you should just
cheer Los cause ya'll ain't even near G.O.A.T.S
that is just a
mere hoax 'n' I ain't tryna hear jokes
all I'm tryna do
is get this fuckin shit clear folks
I am what they
fear most drinkin rootbeer floats
President of
Dope House and even got the queer's votes
"How do you
know that you da best? Can ya share it?"
Well, like a
bird that gave birth, it's a parent
haters you can
lick a nut matta fact sick a duck
"Los, but
the kids are reading this!" I don't give a fuck
drinkin outa
prison cup locked like an animal
I swear I heard
the judge say, "Remember the Alamo!"
all they really
did, took me from a slow suicide
They was at the
party like, "Toast to Los crucified!"
"Wait,
Judge, look outside! Those are all his Stan fans!
Blacks, Whites,
Browns even aggravated Afghans!
Indians and
Asians, too. Look! there's a buncha nunns!
One's gotta
fuckin gun! Run! We're in trouble, Judge!"
I done did a
hundred months askin guards, "What's for lunch?"
watchin T.V.
playin chess eatin Crunch 'n' Munch
chillin with
computer hackaz, pistol packaz, money jackaz
old men wearin
Huggy pampaz unlucky bastards
me, I be higha
than Mariah's fifth octive
I went up for a
lay up but my potna Cliff blocked it
I was like,
"Man, in the world people let me win!"
He was like,
"Los, look, fuck if you SPM."
Fine! I'll just
stick to rap! make the people jubilant
doing comp and
only usin one squeeze of lubricant
slap'em like a
stupid kid make'em tie his shoestrings
this is not
chess bitch how can there be two kings
fuck it, though,
you can claim it all, I ain't trippin on it
Nas put rap in a
grave, I'm just pissin on it! (lol!)
Los
Sunday, July 1, 2012
Letter to Pat Lykos 22
If
you’re here because you got a card at Urbanfest, welcome! Thanks for your
interest in Carlos Coy’s case.
Here’s
my first letter of the month to D.A. Pat Lykos. As you can see, I’m trying to
bring what we’ve learned from Coy’s June letter to her attention. Please feel
free to print this out, write your own, or just download the flyers on the
sidebar to your right and send it to the address below.
District Attorney
Patricia Lykos
1201 Franklin St
Houston, Tx
77002
1201 Franklin St
Houston, Tx
77002
Ma'am,
I'm writing
today about the case of Carlos Coy, #908426.
As you may be
aware, a district judge in Shelby County recommended overturning the trial of Mr.
Kenneth Boyd based on “a pattern of prosecutorial misconduct.” We recently
learned about a similar instance in the case of Carlos Coy, centering on
whether or not the young accuser in his case had seen a particularly graphic
horror movie.
Although she
made it apparent early on that she had seen the whole movie, Judge Ellis seems
to have allowed the prosecution several opportunities to adjust the girl's
testimony. When the judge could no longer ignore her insistence that she had
seen the whole thing, he allowed the child's mother to testify twice, once out
of the presence of the jury and once in front of them, and she swore to two
different versions of how and where the movies were seen.
Ma'am, I do not
believe this was a good example of the Harris County D.A.’s office seeking
justice. You can see for yourself in volumes 14-16 of the trial transcripts. Every
time an innocent man walks free, the public becomes more aware of the way these
trials are conducted. I urge you again to take a look at Coy vs. Texas, and
imagine how it looks to those of us who have no legal background, who have
until recently simply trusted that the Justice System desires justice.
Was this the
only time prosecutors were allowed time to ‘tweak’ the child’s testimony? Was
it the only time the judge allowed testimony that was almost the polar opposite
of what had been offered when the jury was not present? Unfortunately, I do not
have access to the full court transcript, and everything that was used for the
investigation and to build the case against Coy is hidden behind the Family
Code. You have access to this. Please, take a look; was justice done?
Me, My address,
blah blah blah.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)