Updated Thursdays

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Probability

If you haven't heard the latest release from The S.O.N., go here to check it out: https://soundcloud.com/DopeHouseOfficial

I’m digging into the mailbag for today’s post; there are a couple of things that I’ve wanted to go over again and this letter just ties them all together so neatly.

Hello, I have a question. Did spm testify at his criminal trial or civil trial? I have read through much of your blog, and I can't seem to find a mention of it. If he did, is there a transcript of it?

There are transcripts of each trial, but I have not seen them. If you've read through much of the blog, you know this. 

I just reread "South Park monster" and it says he testified after being convicted. Was this during a sentencing phase? Where can this transcript be found? Maybe you've seen it. I have to be honest, I was a fan of the music, but I find that I can't bring myself to listen to it anymore. You know the joke about jail? Everyone's innocent.

The argument you’re making here is one of probability; very useful when looking at, say, the prison system as a whole, but absurd when you’re looking at an individual case.

For example: let’s say you fill a room with 99 dogs, and one child; the probability of the child being a dog is high, if you just look at the numbers. Saying, “The room is full of dogs” is statistically likely to be a true statement.

But, judged individually, it’s ridiculous. The fact that there are 99 dogs in the room has no bearing on the fact that the child is a child. Proximity to the dogs doesn't make the child one of them. The probability of the child being a dog cannot be considered factual if you make even the tiniest effort to investigate.

Now I understand that there are wrongful convictions. I do. But there is something that strikes me as false when I read a small comment that spm makes in one of his letters. He says that his calls were suspended because he " supposedly had marijuana in his system". But he himself has said in other letters that he recently stopped smoking, even behind bars.

All I or anyone else can ask you to do, when it comes to determining Coy’s guilt or innocence, is to make a personal decision. If the thought that he lied about smoking weed three years ago make you believe he’d lie about molesting a child, then I can’t argue against that. That’s your decision based on your observations and feelings, and I respect it. That’s why I do not argue that he is innocent on this blog. I have no more evidence of his innocence than I do of his guilt.

I believe he’s innocent, but that’s just one person’s opinion. What I can argue, and I believe I will eventually be able to prove, is that his trial was not just; it was not impartial. He was not allowed the presumption of innocence, as so many men accused of harming children are not.

 I'm sorry that this email has become so long. I really just wanted to ask a question but all this just poured out. I want you to know that there are Mexican male readers who try to look objectively and not just yell "free spm!" in the comments after every post. Thank you for reading this if you did. 

I love talking about this case; I have been talking about it for a long time now, and I will continue to do so because it interests me. I would never expect anyone to make a decision about Coy’s case based on race. I am not a Mexican male; I don’t expect TDCJ to just “free SPM.” I want him to have a new trial governed by the protections set in place to protect individual liberty. I don’t want that for him because we’re similar in any way, or because of his music or fame; I want it because the encroachment against his liberty threatens mine.

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Reminder

Trey Coy has announced that 'The River' will be released tomorrow; if that's not enough excitement for you, check out this clip of SPM & Baby Bash playing Ping Pong; Thanks to DVD520!

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Letter to Devon Anderson 3

Time for another letter to the DA! This one talks about the case of former judge Elizabeth Coker; if you're interested in reading more about the scandal, go here and here. As always, I really appreciate everyone who shows their support by sending one of these off; you can copy this one, write your own, or even just print out one of the downloadable flyers to your right.

The goal is to get and keep this case in the minds of those who work at the DA's office, and the more letters they get, the more they'll feel the pressure to do something about it.



The Honorable Devon Anderson
1201 Franklin St
Suite 600
Houston, Tx 77002-1923

Ma’am,

I’m writing to you today about the case of Carlos Coy, #908426.

            You may or may not have been following the story of Judge Elizabeth Coker, out of Polk county. After a scandal that involved her texting advice to a prosecutor during a trial, she has resigned from the bench.

            No criminal charges were filed against her, and as far as I can tell there will be no investigation into her past trials, even though the commission released an agreement stating that, “...Coker allegedly showed bias in favor of certain attorneys and a prejudice against others in her rulings and appointments. It also states there were allegations she met with jurors while they were deliberating in trials.”

I cannot imagine the difficulties a judge faces every day when trying to adopt a truly impartial view of the events presented to them in the courtroom; obviously, sometimes they are unable to do so, and I suspect that this may have been an issue in Coy’s trial. Some of the decisions of the judge in his trial are inexplicable; for example, when he allowed witnesses to change their testimony depending on whether they were in the presence of the jury or not; concealing evidence of the witness’ dishonesty or forgetfulness that may have allowed the jury to better judge the weight of what they said.

We know these things happen, through malice or carelessness or even misguided good intentions. Please, initiate a review of Coy’s case; take a look at the behavior of the officers of the court and consider whether justice was allowed to prevail.


Me, my address, etc etc etc.

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Ernie Lopez 2


You may remember the case of ErnieLopez, who was convicted of horrifically raping a 6 month old baby girl to death. He was sentenced to 60 years, and served 9 of them until it was decided that hey, what do you know, her injuries were more likely caused by a severe blood disorder. He was released in early 2012, but prosecutors announced that they would try the case again.

Well, it looks like they hooked him up with a plea deal, felony injury to a child, in exchange for time served. How did he injure the child? What did he do that left broken blood vessels that looked like bruises all over her tiny body, and blood oozing from every orifice? Well, it was something he admitted to during his first interrogation; He may have been a little rough changing her diaper.

Last year, Lopez explained that the first time he went to trial he believed innocent people don't get convicted. Then he spent nine years in prison. This time, he would have had key medical experts and a more developed defense. Yet he still faced the risk of conviction.
"I don't think any one of us believes he would be convicted," Heather Kirkwood, an attorney who handled Lopez's appeal, said earlier this week. "But in these cases, there's no guarantee."

Is it logical to believe that injuries from being raped to death could be mimicked by a diaper change? If the prosecutors truly believed he was guilty, why offer the plea deal? Why allow this guy, a monster in their eyes, to roam free? On the flip side if they, like I, had any doubt about how someone could cause injuries like that by changing a diaper, why force him to take a plea deal? Lopez would have been eligible for around $720,000 for his years of wrongful incarceration;

“Under the terms of the plea agreement, he is prohibited from proclaiming his innocence or encouraging anyone else to do so.


Although part of me wishes that Ernie Lopez would have taken his second case to trial and proven his innocence, I can’t fault him for caving. When those whose job it is to defend an individual from the depredations of the state come out and say, “Take the deal”, how can you have any confidence in the justice system? Coy was offered a plea deal before he went to trial; five years for admitting something to that he has said for the last 11 years that he didn’t do. I suspect the rational behind that offer was similar to that behind Lopez’s deal. “Due process be damned; we really, reeeeeeeally think he’s guilty, but we can’t prove it. Maybe we can use the threat of a trial to get some small win out of this.”



Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Letter to Devon Anderson 2

Time for another letter to the D.A.! As always, please feel free to copy this one, write your own, or just print out one of the flyers to your right and send that in. 

The Honorable Devon Anderson
1201 Franklin St
Suite 600
Houston, Tx 77002-1923

Ma,am

I’m writing today about the case of Carlos Coy, case #908426.

Once again, I am requesting an investigation into his case. The crime has was convicted of was unspeakable; the gut feelings most people have, when they hear an accusation like the one leveled against him, are disgust and condemnation. As a mother, I understand that.

But because I am a mother, I cannot accept that my son could one day be sentenced for a similar crime on similar evidence. There was no smoking gun, no reasonable proof of guilt. There were accusations, apparently refined by an organization known for gathering evidence for police instead of conducting unbiased medical exams. There was testimony that changed from day to day, just never in front of the jury. There were expert opinions based on feeling, based on presumption, but never a shred of physical evidence.

As a citizen, I would like to regain the faith I once had in our justice system; I want very much to trust the judgment of the courts. I want to believe that if, God forbid, someone I loved was brought to trial for a crime they did not commit they would receive a fair hearing; that they would be presumed innocent.

Coy was not given that benefit. The prosecutors labeled the complainant as a victim from the opening moments of the trial, before it had ever been established that an assault had occurred. The judge said nothing when the prosecution’s witnesses gave testimony to the court, then change it when it was presented to the jury.

Please, take a closer look at a case that means so much to so many of your citizens. Give us justice.

Me, my address, etc.

Wednesday, October 2, 2013

Dear Family 12

Family Letter:             “The Never-Ending Letter”                   

Yung Fambo!
          
What the dilla? Shit, me, just chillin. Nigga came through, and since it's all rhymin, tell me what it do.

Damn, I didn't know that I would start with a flow


but fuck it since I jumped in the car then let's go


Mista C.Coy's in this I don't need my boys in this


all I need is choicy chicks 'n' diamonds big as oysters bitch


this is true murda rap, every rapper curse the fact


that I'm that, person that's, harder than a turtle's back


servin crack, burnin sacks, turnin Lacs, hurtin tracks


who the fuck sees me, my flow deserves thirty plaques


how bout just a couple trophies, make one for soccer too


cause I'm pretty good, if I only had the proper shoe


all we have is Converse, the old ones, like mom wore


since I brought her up, that be who I did this song for


but she don't believe me cause she said it wasn't even planned


Mom you're just sayin that cause really you're a Weezy fan!


if you bought his single ma, don't forget that Jesus saw


Sylvia said she heard you tryna sing it at the bingo ball


wait till the SON is born, I'mma make you take it back!


you're that person at the Texans game, in a Raider's cap!


you're the one who partied after De La Hoya beat Chavez!


probably if crossin was a skill you could teach college!


or, maybe I'm trippin, maybe you be jammin me


I just want my family to know that I'm "Your Majesty"


then I want my picture real big, in the livingroom


put the others where you keep the mop, and the kitchen broom


no I'm not selfish Mom, why you always call me that!


I'm the one who helped you fold the clothes at the laundromat!


when you washed dishes answer this: Who would do the rinsin!


then we watched novelas in the afternoon on Univision


I laughed when you laughed, I never understood the words


you cried when I cried, feed the world to the birds


next giveaway be "Without the SON" or "The River"


why you think the compitition already pourin liquor


two shots to numb the stress, pure dope and nothin less


S.P. to-da fuckin Mex, carve it in somebody's chest


punish vets, with the same whip that the youngest gets


you verses me, equals me plus a bloody mess


fuck recognition I don't need attention or a vote


"Niggas can't fuck with Los", that's ya fuckin horrascope.....



            Damn, where did all that come from? I’m sensing a little frustration within me.

            Since I didn’t give this Cold 40 a title, I shall do that, now. Hmmm, how about “Choicy Chicks and Oysters”?

            No, that don’t sound right. How bout “Mom Loves Weezy”? Actually, I think “Horrascope” sounds cool. Fuck it, “Horrascope” it is. One of the books I’m putting together is called “SPM’s School of Rap” and it’ll have tons of Cold 40s in it, so that’s why I needed a title.

            So, how is you? I’m calling this letter “never-ending” because I’m just going to write till I get tired, and mail it off. I’m not even going to say “bye” or sign my name at the end. I’ll just pick up where I left off on the next day, and call the next letter “The Never-Ending Letter Part 2.”

            A lot has happened since I really sat down and wrote you. I see that “Eric” was kicked off the site. For those who don’t know, Eric has been one of our most critical critics, skeptical skeptics and haterfullistic haters on this blog. Personally, I feel he’s important to my goals of showing the world what really went on in my case. He’s the voice of other people who think I would mess with somebody’s child. To address his points is to address the views of other skeptics. But it seems he crossed a line that made Incandesio uncomfortable. From what I understand, Eric began to search for personal information on her. I’ll give you a partial exchange that I saw on one of her letters to me:

Incandesio said:
            “It has come to your attention”...So you’re invested in this enough to look up my Facebook profile? Dude, that is creepy as hell.

            Eric said...
            LOL, you’re lucky I haven’t posted on there yet

            Incandesio said...
Well, gee, what are you going to post?
“Hi, I’m that guy who gets so upset when someone disagrees with me that I creep around their Facebook page and wack off to it”?

---
I remember another exchange where Eric invited Incandesio to have a drink. I’m sure he was kidding, but I thought to myself, “This dude is attracted to her.”

            I can’t say I blame him, there’s nothing more attractive than an educated, intelligent woman. But, maybe all this time he’s been debating with her, he’s been enjoying himself more than we thought. I could be wrong, but you don’t invite a chick for a drink unless you got business, or you wanna give her the business. Of course, Incandesio told him she had better taste.

            Either way, I’m sorry about Eric’s banning. He had a point when he told Incandesio (and I’m paraphrasing), “You should be thankful for me. If not for me, all you’d have is SPM supporters and no one to debate with.”

            Whatever Incandesio’s decision is, I respect. She’s a mother of 5 children, the wife of a United States Marine, and every decision she makes is with her family in mind.

            One person said—in so many words—that she banned Eric because she couldn’t handle the challenge. I read this comment around the time they were arguing about something that happened in my civil trial.

            See, a while back I wrote a write-up where I said that the civil jury didn’t fall for all the bullshit the way the criminal jury did. I basically said that the civil jury either believed I was innocent, or had major doubts I was guilty.

            Eric’s argument was that the civil jury voted “yes” on malicious intent, which means that I had meant to cause the child malice. Therefore, the jury did believe I was guilty. He kept repeating over and over, “Don’t you know that they had a choice, Incandesio? They could’ve voted ‘no’. Answer the question, Incandesio, don’t you know they could’ve voted ‘no’?”

            He thought he had something going, but let me speak to that point.

            When a person gets convicted of a crime, he can appeal the conviction. It’s a process where the appeal goes through different courts. The first two or three appeals goes to places in the State you were convict in. In my case, it went to people in Texas. Well, the State just spent a bunch of money getting you convicted, so they almost never give you relief. All lawyers know that. You have to keep pushing your appeals to federal courts, like the 5th Circuit and the Supreme Court in Washington. But once your conviction is denied by those in your State, it’s considered “final.” After it’s “final”, the plaintiff can take you to civil court (to sue you for money), and ask the civil judge to not allow you the opportunity to defend yourself. That’s what they did to me. They waited three years, till 2005, when all my State appeals were exhausted, to take me to civil court. They knew if they would have allowed me to defend myself, they wouldn’t have won.

            I didn’t know about this law, and I couldn’t wait for the civil trial. I wanted to, once and for all, prove my innocence. In criminal trial, I took the shit for what it was, a fucking joke. I was actually rewriting the script for a film we were working on, during the trial. I totally underestimated the State’s ability, determination, and resources to make bullshit sound believable.

            Anyway, when my civil lawyer gave me the bad news, he said, “Carlos, I’m sorry but we won’t be able to fight the charges. You won’t even be able to say you didn’t do this.”

            “What are you talking about?” I said.

            “Your conviction is considered final as far as Texas is concerned.”

            We went back and forth on this for a while, then he said, “It might be wise for you and your brother to think about settling out of court. The jury can give this family any amount of money they choose. There’s no cap on the amount.”

            In other words, he was saying that they could award a trillion dollars if they wanted. Of course, I could never pay that much, but any penny I made (for the rest of my life) would go straight to them.

            Me and my brother talked about it and he said he would offer $300,000 dollars. He said, “Carlos, I know it sucks, but you could lose everything you’ve ever worked for. We’ve got to think about our future.”

            I was furious, but it was a figure we could afford, and still continue operating DHR without skipping a beat.

            My lawyer presented their lawyer with the offer, and their lawyer laughed at it. It wasn’t enough in their eyes. That meant we would be going to court.

            Believe it or not, my lawyer was a steadfast Christian. I mean, I’m a Christian too, just not a very good one. But he believed in me, and took my case only after praying all night about it.

            My lawyer ended up being amazing in that courtroom. even with his hands tied behind his back, even without being able to say, “My client didn’t do this!” he showed the jury what kind of family we were dealing with. He revealed truths that began to paint the real picture. It’s almost unexplainable what happened in that courtroom.
            But this is what the judge told the jury at the beginning of the trial.

Civil Trial
Court Transcripts Volume 4 of 9 (pgs. 24,25)
Judge: Now, I need your attention for a few minutes because I’m going to give you some information about this case, and I’m also going to give you some specific instruction. I will try not and take too much of your time this morning before I turn you over to the lawyers and allow them to ask you questions, but it’s very important that everyone pay attention to the next few minutes as I give you some information and instructions.
            Let me begin by asking the general question: Can everyone hear me? If you cannot hear me, raise your hand. All right. I see no hands.

            This is a civil case in which (Mary Doe) is asking the jury to award money damages to her daughter (Jane Doe) based on an incident which took place on or about September 1, 2001.
            The defendant in this case is Carlos Coy. He has been in the entertainment business and he is also known as South Park Mexican. The basis of the claim by the plaintiff is that Carlos Coy committed a sexual assault on (Jane Doe) who at the time was nine years of age.

            Carlos Coy has been tried for this incident and convicted in Harris County and is currently incarcerated in the Texas Department of Corrections. His conviction has become final; therefore, you will not be asked any questions about whether or not this assault took place. The nature of the sexual assault is set forth on the indictment which will be here for you to see.

            As I have previously mentioned, this is a civil case. The case that we will try here is a case in which the plaintiff seeks money damages. That will be the critical inquiry for the jury in this case.
____
The jury was instructed, from the very beginning, to look at me as guilty, and to look at this crime as if it did happen.

            The trial was split in two parts. The first part was damages, which means how much money will it cost for all the therapy, counseling, psychiatrists the child would need, throughout her entire life, to help her deal with the effects of such a crime. We all know that a lifetime of problems can incur from being sexually assaulted, and that could potentially cost a fortune.

            The second part of the trial was the punitive stage. That’s where even bigger money is. Their lawyer told the jury that that’s where you give a “multiple amount” of what you gave during the damages phase.

            After the first part was over, all they gave the family was twenty-five grand. If you don’t know, that’s an insult of an amount. We’re talking about a child who was supposedly robbed of her innocence. That amount of dollars depicts the doubt this jury had about this supposed crime. They knew I was the number one selling artist at my distribution company, Southwest Wholesale. They knew I had just signed with Universal Records. They even heard the story of me giving Nathan Perez a $100,000 dollar Mercedes.

            My lawyer, his assistant, my brother and myself went back to my private quarters and hugged each other. No one said a word, it was a quiet celebration. The jury was thinking for themselves, that much was clear.

            At the same time, the jury never heard a trial on the sexual assault charge. They never heard the full story like the criminal jury did. The family was lucky for that becaus ethe little girl seems to have forgotten profound details about the story. For example, the length of time I was supposed to have assaulted her. Here’s what she said in the criminal trial:

Criminal Trial
Court Transcripts Volume 11 of 31 (pg.93)
DA Oncken: Okay. And how long did he lick you?
Jane Doe: About a minute.
DA Oncken: About a minute. And did he stop after about a minute?
Jane Doe: Yes.
DA Oncken: Yeah. And what did he do when he stopped?
Jane Doe: He told me not to tell nobody.
DA Oncken: He told you not to tell anybody?
Jane Doe: Yes.
___
Here’s what she said in the civil trial:
Civil Trial
Court Transcripts Volume 4 of 9 (pg.49)
Their Lawyer: How long—was it just, like, one lick or was it a long time or what?
Jane Doe: It was one lick.
Their Lawyer: And is that when he left after the one lick?
Jane Doe: Yes.
Their Lawyer: And then, you went to use the restroom? You remember that?
Jane Doe: Yes.
___
Even before this civil trial began, during her deposition (a pre-trial interview under sworn oath), she told my civil lawyer that the assault only lasted “one second.” My lawyer knew what she said in the criminal trial so he asked her again, and her answer was the same.

            Either she forgot what she said in criminal trial, or she had a guilty conscience and felt that a “one second” assault was less of a lie than an “about a minute” assault.

            So, there I was, right in the middle of working on my first film, just signed with Universal, seeing all my dreams finally coming true, and I’m supposed to have thrown it all away to lick somebody’s child for a second? As I’ve said before, I didn’t do this for one second, or one hundredth of a second. It was a lie, and the civil jury knew the shit didn’t make sense.

            So, then came the second part of the civil trial, the punitive phase. This is where there’s no cap on the amount I could lose.

            The jury was asked to answer two questions:

            1.) Did Carlos Coy knowingly cause malice to the plaintiff?
            2.) How much money should he have to pay?

            Of course, anyone who assaults a child knows that it will cause them malice. And the jury was instructed to view this crime as if it did happen, so they voted “yes” on question one. Remember, they were never given a chance to hear a trial on the charges. Eric’s argument was that the punitive phase was a separate thing from the damages phase, that the jury could have said “no” to malice, that they had a choice. True, true, and true, homie, but they never heard a trial. I still wasn’t able to say “I didn’t do this.” How could they have voted “no”, even if they had a choice, if I was never able to defend myself? But what was their answer to question two, Mr. Eric? In case you forgot, it was “zero dollars.”

            Ya see, if the jury would have voted “no” to malicious harm, and then gave them “zero dollars”, the zero dollars wouldn’t have stood out so much. But to say, “Yes, Carlos Coy did knowingly cause malicious harm to this child,” and then not give her enough for a fucking cheeseburger, speaks volumes of how this jury felt. They said, “Fine, we’ll go with what the court said about his guilt, but we won’t punish a man we don’t think is guilty.”

            Do you really believe that jury thought I molested a child, destroyed her life, cause her a lifetime of pain and suffering? Come on, homie, get your head out of your ass. Society despises child molesters because we all have children of our own.

            In my criminal trial, when the DA asked me how much time I would give someone if they molested my daughter, I said, “If someone molested my girl, they wouldn’t make it to trial.”

            The DA loved that answer. She immediately said, “Are you saying you would do something violent, Mr. Coy!”

            ‘Bitch, shut up before I fuck you in the ass in front of everybody.’ That’s what I should have said.
            But the jury in the criminal court gave me forty-five years so my answer to that question wasn’t the best thing I could have said.

            So, I lost in the criminal court, but I consider what happened in civil court a great victory. One thing for sure, it saved us $275,000 dollars.

            What’s funny is when I first met the family’s civil lawyer, it was during my deposition, a few months before the trial started. Their lawyer along with my lawyer, came to visit me at a prison called the Goree Unit. We sat in the visiting room, and I complimented their lawyer on his shirt. It was a pink Polo, and I respect a man with enough nuts to wear pink. But the dude didn’t even acknowledge me. He just looked at my lawyer and asked, “Are you ready to proceed, Mr. Akers?”

            After the trial was over, after the family walked out of the courtroom, that same lawyer came to my table and shook my hand. He said, “I wish you the best, Mr. Coy.”

            I’m no mind reader, but that man’s eyes were full of compassion. There’s no doubt in my mind, even their own lawyer knew I didn’t do this shit. His funky ass was just trying to get paid. Civil lawyers get around 50 to 60 percent of what the jury awards.

            Two years after that civil trial, at the age of 15, Jane Doe was pregnant with her first child. As far as the “assault”, from what I’ve heard, she’s told people it never happened. But, officially, she’s sticking with her “one second” story. She’s gone from about sixty seconds, to one, and now we’re only one second away from the truth.

            It’s all good, trust me. There’s only two things this world can do with me, either kill me, or make me stronger. In the world I was doing big things, but at the same time I was a pathetic husband, pathetic father, pathetic man. All I did was fuck thick hoes, smoke thick blunts, and sip thick syrup. I had beef with so many dicksuckers, it was unreal.  Death was in the air, and these bitch-ass niggas was closing in. But I’ve got a whole book to write on that.

            Like I’ve said before, if I am a Christian, I damn sure ain’t a good one. But I love the Lord, and I trust him. There’s no doubt that I’d be dead today if I hadn’t come to prison, so I thank God for everything. I know it sounds odd coming from the founder of Dope House Records, but I’m no fool. I read my Bible every day. And I suggest that everyone do that. I don’t give a fuck if you’re a hit man. The biggest fool on earth is the atheist, but there’s hope for everyone else.


            Damn, a nigga went off on some preacher-type shit! This muhfuckin coffee, mayne.....

I'm drunk off the coffee, drunk off the Sprite

drunk off some shit that I drank last night

freestyle flow right before I jus end it

nigga feel splendid, peace to Lil Kendrick

said he was the best but, who am I to argue?

say it in my face muhfucka I will scar you

all about the action, all about the camera

Donkey Kong, Cheech 'n' Chong, problematic gambla

not the Hamburgla I am the manmurdera

just to make it rhyme nigga stole the damn furmula

Listerine gurgla, Panasonic screen fall

ain't that a bitch, A damn Meskin the king, y'all

no I can't sing cause the weed overheats my throat

"Los, that's a poor excuse! Even Justin Beiber smokes!"

maybe he be lip-synchin, you don't know the real story


Why you always knockin me! Really you should kill for me!