There’s been a lot of noise about Dallas PD’s new policy of requiring
cops involved in a shooting to have a three-day ‘cooling off’ period before
making an official statement.
This was after police shot a man
who was standing with his arms at his sides, eight seconds after the officers
left their car; the shooter’s partner then gave an official statement that the
victim had charged towards them with a knife.
This turned out to be slightly not
true, as was later proven by video tape taken from a neighbor’s surveillance
system. Oops. This memory lapse was blamed on the stress of the shooting, and
Dallas’s Police Chief changed the policy prohibiting the officer from making an
official report until at least 72 hours have passed.
There are a couple of reasons why
this is so controversial; the first, obviously, is that this courtesy is not
extended to the rest of the population. If you shoot someone, they’re not going
to give you a few days to think about your statement, they’re going to haul
your ass in to the station and start grilling you.
The second reason is, the policy
change was ostensibly based on the rational that officers would remember
incidents more clearly after a few days had passed. This goes against common
sense and observable human ability, as well as multiple studies on recall.
So...why does any of this matter?
What does it have to do with the case? You may recall that Jane Doe was not
interviewed about her accusations until six days after the supposed assault. After
this interview, during which the mother’s written statement was discarded,
there was a period of three days, and then she was re-interviewed at the CAC (soon-to-be
notorious for employees generating evidence to support police investigations,
as opposed to helping child victims).
For the same reason that it’s foolish
to allow a shooter to have three days to get his details straight, these delays
in Coy’s case were not good practice. The gaps between accusation, interview,
and then the second interview negated any chances of collecting physical
evidence, and allowed time for memories to sharpen, level, and distort. If
details were added to her story, it was during these times. Remember that her
accusation evolved from touching to full-on oral sex, even though Officer Heidi
Ruiz swore that both interviews were identical.
No comments:
Post a Comment